Why not let anyone stand and let the electorate decide at the ballot box?

Why do so many people have to be involved? Why not let anyone who wants to just put his or her name forward to be put on the ballot, and let the electorate decide in the privacy of the voting booth? 

In principle, there is nothing wrong with this approach. Cuba's integrated approach, however, gets as many people as possible involved in the electoral process from the very start--beginning with the public nomination meetings for municipal deputies, right up to the final vote for the National Assembly. This level of participation is something to be applauded.

By contrast, in the USA, where there is no such public nomination process, the role of the public in the electoral process is one of almost total passivity. The vast majority are actively involved only in the final vote. And even then, the majority often abstains from even this limited role!


With the safeguards built into it, the Cuban system seems to me to be a more democratic alternative. It is certainly no less democratic. If someone or some faction can't make it past this process, it can only be that they would not have sufficient public support in any case.

Related Questions

 

Previous | Next

Return

Home